The Modern Independent

The Story Behind ‘Epistemic Closure’

Posted by Ryan Dawkins

I have been wanting to write about the ongoing debate raging in the blogosphere regarding the idea of epistemic closure and the intellectual health of not only the political right, but the left as well.  To my surprise, The New York Times actually outlined the basic contours of the debate pretty well yesterday. Rather than reinventing the wheel, here is what the Times had to say:

The phrase is being used as shorthand by some prominent conservatives for a kind of closed-mindedness in the movement, a development they see as debasing modern conservatism’s proud intellectual history. First used in this context by Julian Sanchez of the libertarian Cato Institute, the phrase “epistemic closure” has been ricocheting among conservative publications and blogs as a high-toned abbreviation for ideological intolerance and misinformation.

Understanding the 16th Amendment

Posted by Ryan Dawkins

George Will wrote a curiously uninformed column today in the Washington Post.  Referencing an article published in May of last year, he suggested that liberals can have a serious discussion of the value-added tax in Congress, but only after conservatives get to repeal of the 16th Amendment. In other words, Will is offering an exchange: a national sales tax, as embodied in the value-added tax, for an end of the federal income tax.

Although recognizing some real benefits to the VAT, Will argues that it cannot coincide with a federal income tax.  “Without ending the income tax,” Will argues, “a VAT would be just a gargantuan instrument for further subjugating Americans to government…and proclaim the impossibility of serious spending reductions and hence would be the obituary for the Founders' vision of limited government.”