The Modern Independent

Net Neutrality Has Consequences For More Than Just Computer Nerds

Posted by Ryan Dawkins

Probably the most succinct summary of the of the D.C. Circuit Court ruling regarding Net Neutrality—that is, the idea that all information should be treated equally and that all people deserve equal access to it, regardless of its source or content—came from the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday when it wrote:

A U.S. appeals court ruled Tuesday that the Federal Communications Commission overstepped when it cited cable-giant Comcast Corp. for slowing some Internet traffic on its network, dealing a blow to big Web commerce companies and other proponents of "net neutrality."

In a unanimous decision, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said the FCC exceeded its authority when it sanctioned Comcast in 2008 for deliberately preventing some subscribers from using peer-to-peer file-sharing services to download large files.

Texas's Low-Wall of Separation: Thomas Aquinas for President?

Posted by Ryan Dawkins

On Friday, the Texas Board of Education approved sweeping changes to the state's social studies curriculum. These reforms will put a markedly conservative stamp on history and economic textbooks for years to come, and it will have wide-reaching consequences for the national textbook market because Texas is the second largest purchaser of high school textbooks. According to the New York Times, the changes were made on the 10 to 5 party-in vote and they are intended to stress "the superiority of American capitalism, question the Founding Fathers' commitment to a purely secular government and present Republican political philosophies in a more positive light."

The new Texas social studies standards mark only the most recent chapter in the culture wars, which have until recently remained dormant for the last couple of years. Some of the changes made are not that objectionable, at least not for me. For example, one change includes the addition of Milton Friedman and Fredrick von Hayek, whose work have had an enormous impact on the direction of economic theory and helped justify the massive efforts to deregulate the economy the last 30 years, to the usual list of economists studied, which already includes Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes. Another relatively benign change, is new emphasis on the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and 1990s, which again is something that cannot be ignored especially because of its indelible impact on the modern state. Even the inclusion of the violent philosophy of the Black Panthers during the civil rights movement is intellectually defensible so long as the Panther's relative influence within the largely non-violent movement is kept in proper perspective.

Does Tom Lucero Have a Constitution Problem?

Posted by Ryan Dawkins

Tom Lucero is wandering into a potential political quagmire. The Loveland Republican, who is vying to unseat Congresswoman Betsy Markey, has been showcasing in his stump speech the role he played as a member of the CU Board of Regents in the dismissal of CU Ethnic Studies Professor Ward Churchill.

In January, he even aired this commercial: