The Modern Independent

Ken Buck’s Problem with Women Unlikely to Swing Election

Posted by Ryan Dawkins

There has been a great deal of coverage regarding Ken Buck’s disconnect with women voters this week ever since the Colorado Independent published its hard-hitting report on his refusal to prosecute a 2005 date rape case involving a 21-year-old UNC student.

Since the Independent story, follow-up reports have been written by the Denver Post, Greeley Tribune, and even the Huffington Post.  Among the various facts revealed over the last couple of days is an admission by the suspect in the case that he continued to pursue sexual relations after the victim told him ‘No,’ as well as the suspect being recorded over the phone admitting that he recognizes what he did as rape. 

For many Democrats, this story feeds into and confirms a long running narrative around the Weld County District Attorney—namely that he is bad for women voters.  Other elements in the narrative include his draconian opposition to abortion, his initial support of Colorado’s Amendment 62, and the politically imprudent comment he made during the GOP primary that Republicans should vote for him because “he doesn’t wear high-heels”.

The Politics of Spilled Oil and the Morality of Drilling

Posted by Ryan Dawkins

In a paradoxical turn of events, Jonathan Weismann is reporting this morning in the Wall Street Journal that the Deepwater Horizon oil spill may make an energy bill in the Senate less likely:

Key Democrats said the spill should drive Congress forward on legislation to address climate change and promote alternative energy sources and electric cars. They also have called for regulations that would require more-robust safety technology on offshore rigs, such as remote-control acoustic shut-off switches….

But some Democratic and Republican senators said the incident makes progress on energy and climate legislation less likely. Coastal senators, such as Democrats Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Bill Nelson of Florida, vowed to block expanded drilling in any bill. Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R., Ariz.) said legislation can't move forward without three "pillars": expanded oil and gas exploration, more nuclear power and a price on carbon-emissions in exchange for the first two.

Reforming the Senate Filibuster

Posted by Ryan Dawkins

Washington Post columnist, Ruth Marcus, has a noteworthy column this morning offering a four and a half step process in fixing the filibuster. The filibuster, of course, has been used more and more in the legislative process over the last decade as a tool of minority party obstructionism.

As such, it has led some—like blogger Ezra Klein—to argue that it is one of the various reasons why Congress is broken.   Indeed, between 2007 and 2010, the Senate has had to call 214 cloture votes to break filibusters, far more than the 57 years between 1919 and 1976.

John McCain’s Enduring Legacy

Posted by Ryan Dawkins

The media is aflutter over John McCain's struggle to keep his Senate seat in Arizona because of the strong primary challenge he is facing from J.D. Hayworth, a former Arizona congressman and AM talk radio host.  Hayworth has the blessing of the tea party crowd and is painting himself as a 'consistent conservative.'  Even though McCain has a deep following among right-leaning centrists, independents, and conservative Democrats, the Republican base views him skeptically, which is why he is taking Hayworth's challenge seriously.

Enter Sarah Palin last week by McCain's side at a rally at Tucson's Pima County Fairgrounds. Palin stumped for McCain in an attempt to shore up his eroding support among conservatives. Her campaigning for McCain has given the media ample material to pontificate on the meaning of Palin's visit.

Financial Regulatory Reform 101

Posted by Ryan Dawkins

Last June, the President Obama released its Treasury Department white paper for financial regulatory reform. The paper was published in light of the most severe financial crisis since the Great Depression. The Wall Street Journal actually released a really great synopsis of the white paper in the form of bullet points.

Using the administration's white paper as a signpost for reform, the House of Representatives passed the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (H.R. 4173) in mid-December, and Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conneticut) introduced a Senate version of the bill two weeks ago.

Walking the Walk: Repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell

Posted by Ryan Dawkins

During the presidential campaign, Barack Obama campaigned on ending the military's discriminatory 'Don't Ask, don't tell' policy and vowed that under his administration he would allow gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military. At his first State of the Union address, President Obama again vowed to repeal DADT.

Republicans and other opponents of DADT's repeal have long deferred to the wisdom of military leadership, which tends to be overwhelmingly conservative, on the subject because it was assumed that they would never come out in favor of DADT's appeal. For example, in 20o6, when asked by Chris Matthews where he stood on the issue of gays in the military, Senator John McCain said:

"the day that the leadership of the military comes to me and says, Senator, we ought to change the policy, then I think we ought to consider seriously changing it because those leaders in the military are the ones we give the responsibility to."

Well, three weeks ago, Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee advocating for the repeal of DADT:

"No matter how I look at the issue," Adm. Mullen testified, "I cannot escape being troubled by the fact that we have in place a policy which forces young men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens." Recognizing this as an important civil rights issue, he added that "allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly would be the right thing to do."

Although more cautious, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, a respected Republican and hold over from the Bush Administration, testified before the same committee and noted that repealing DADT wasn't a question of 'if' but 'when'.

The American people seem to be rallying behind overturning the Clinton era law as well. A poll done by Quinnipiac University following Secretary Gates and Adm. Mullen's testimony found that 57 percent favored a repeal of DADT, while 66 percent believed that banning gays and lesbians from serving openly constituted 'discrimination.'

Not everyone is convinced, however. Despite his deference to military leadership on the issue as early as a few years ago, Senator McCain still actively supports DADT. McCain's flip-flop on the issue wouldn't be as offensive if he weren't so brazen about it. At the Senate hearing, McCain said he was 'disappointed' by the testimony, and he stated bluntly that "this moment of immense hardship for our armed services, we should not be seeking to overturn [DADT]," describing it as "imperfect but effective."

Effective at what, I am left asking myself? Discharging qualified and honorable men? Since 1993, over 13,000 fighting men and women have been dishonorably discharged from the military, many of whom with critical language skills like Mandarin, Arabic, and Farsi, for committing no other crime than being gay.

'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' is an embarrassing and shameful policy that should be repealed, and Obama shouldn't shy away from the responsibility of repealing it. He has talked the talk, but now he must walk the walk. Conservatives have long argued that allowing gays into the military would disrupt unit cohesion, hurt morale, and suppress enlistment; yet, Britain allowed gays to serve openly in their military back in 2000 despite hearing similar arguments against it. After the ban was lifted, however, unit cohesion and morale suffered no demonstrative decline and enlistments actually went up.

In a rare moment of honesty in Washington, Adm. Mullen stated in his concluding remarks, "I have served with homosexuals since 1968. Everyone in the military has, and we understand that."

When will this madness end?